See how OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Anthropic, and 11 other companies write their AI disclaimers. Each example includes the actual language they use and analysis of why it works — so you can craft an effective AI disclosure for your own business.
Our AI generator creates EU AI Act and FTC compliant AI disclaimers tailored to your use case. Free to start.
An AI disclaimer is a legal notice that informs users when artificial intelligence technology is being used to generate, assist with, or influence content, recommendations, decisions, or services. It typically explains the limitations of AI outputs and clarifies who bears responsibility for verifying accuracy.
As AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude become embedded in everyday business operations, AI disclaimers have moved from optional nice-to-haves to legal necessities. The EU AI Act, FTC guidelines, and state-level transparency laws increasingly require businesses to disclose when AI is generating or influencing the content users see.
The best AI disclaimers go beyond legal compliance. As you'll see in the examples below, companies like OpenAI, Google, and Adobe use their AI disclaimers to build user trust, set appropriate expectations, and differentiate their approach to responsible AI deployment.
AI-generated content can contain errors, hallucinations, or outdated information. Without a disclaimer, your business may be liable for damages caused by users relying on inaccurate AI outputs. A clear disclaimer establishes that AI outputs require human verification and shifts appropriate responsibility to the user.
The EU AI Act (effective 2025-2026) mandates transparency for AI systems. The FTC has ruled that undisclosed AI-generated content can constitute deceptive practices. The SEC requires AI disclosure in financial services. Non-compliance carries fines up to 7% of global turnover under the EU AI Act.
85% of consumers want to know when AI is being used. Transparent AI disclosure builds trust and reduces backlash. Companies that proactively disclose AI use — like Adobe with Content Credentials — are rewarded with higher user confidence and lower churn rates.
Google, Amazon, Apple, and social media platforms are implementing AI content labeling requirements. Google's Helpful Content guidelines consider AI disclosure. Amazon requires AI-generated product content labeling. Without proper disclaimers, your content may be penalized or removed.
Not all AI disclaimers are the same. The type you need depends on how your business uses AI. Here are the six most common types, with guidance on when each applies.
Used when AI creates text, images, video, or audio that users consume. This is the most common type, needed by anyone publishing AI-generated blog posts, marketing copy, product descriptions, or social media content. It should state that content was AI-generated and may contain inaccuracies.
Common use cases: Publishers, marketers, content creators, e-commerce sites
Used when AI assists human work rather than replacing it entirely. This applies to tools like Grammarly, Copilot, or AI-powered analytics that enhance human decision-making. It should clarify that AI provides suggestions while humans make final decisions.
Common use cases: SaaS companies, productivity tools, writing assistants
Used when AI provides information, answers, or analysis that users might rely on. Essential for chatbots, search tools, and recommendation engines. It should explicitly state that AI outputs are probabilistic and may contain errors, hallucinations, or outdated information.
Common use cases: AI chatbots, search engines, Q&A platforms, research tools
Used when user data may interact with AI systems — either as input to AI processing or potentially as training data. Required by the EU AI Act for transparency about data handling. It should explain whether user content is used to improve AI models and offer opt-out mechanisms.
Common use cases: AI platforms, cloud services, any SaaS with AI features
Used when AI influences decisions that affect users — such as credit scoring, hiring, insurance pricing, or content moderation. The EU AI Act classifies many of these as high-risk AI systems requiring extensive transparency. It should explain how AI contributes to decisions and how users can request human review.
Common use cases: Financial services, HR tech, insurance, healthcare, legal tech
Used specifically for conversational AI interfaces. Many jurisdictions require that users be informed they are interacting with an AI rather than a human. It should clearly identify the chatbot as AI-powered and set expectations about its capabilities and limitations.
Common use cases: Customer service, sales, support, virtual assistants
We analyzed the AI disclaimers and disclosure practices of 15 industry-leading companies across AI platforms, creative tools, developer tools, enterprise software, and media. For each example, we highlight what they do exceptionally well and why it works — so you can apply the same principles to your own AI disclaimer.
AI Platform · Output accuracy and reliability disclaimer
"Artificial intelligence and machine learning are rapidly evolving fields of study. We are constantly working to improve our Services to make them more accurate, reliable, safe, and beneficial. Given the probabilistic nature of machine learning, use of our Services may, in some situations, result in Output that does not accurately reflect real people, places, or facts."
Why it works:
OpenAI leads with transparency about the probabilistic nature of AI. By explicitly acknowledging that outputs may not reflect facts, they set appropriate user expectations while using accessible language. Their disclaimer covers both consumer (ChatGPT) and API use cases, making it a reference standard for the entire AI industry.
AI Platform · AI-generated response quality and limitations
"Gemini Apps are experimental. Gemini Apps generate responses using generative AI so responses may not always be accurate or reliable. Gemini may display inaccurate information, including about people, so double-check its responses. Gemini is not a replacement for professional advice."
Why it works:
Google uses a layered disclaimer strategy. The inline 'experimental' label sets expectations immediately. Their 'double-check its responses' phrasing is direct and actionable, giving users a clear behavior to follow rather than just legal language. The explicit 'not a replacement for professional advice' covers liability in regulated domains.
AI Platform · AI-assisted output responsibility disclaimer
"AI-powered features in our products are designed to help you create, complete, or suggest content. The outputs generated by AI may not always be accurate. We encourage you to review, fact-check, and adjust outputs as needed before relying on them. You are responsible for your use of the content generated using our AI features."
Why it works:
Microsoft takes a practical approach by framing AI as an assistant rather than an authority. Their 'you are responsible' language clearly shifts liability to the user while remaining non-adversarial. By embedding disclaimers across Copilot in Word, Teams, and GitHub, they normalize AI transparency across an enterprise ecosystem.
AI Platform · AI safety and limitation transparency
"Claude is an AI assistant made by Anthropic. Claude's responses are generated by artificial intelligence and may contain errors, inaccuracies, or outdated information. Claude should not be used as a substitute for professional advice in areas such as medical, legal, financial, or other specialized domains."
Why it works:
Anthropic's disclaimer stands out for its emphasis on safety-first AI deployment. Rather than burying limitations in terms of service, they surface disclaimers directly in the product interface. Their approach acknowledges AI limitations while clearly delineating domains where human expertise is non-negotiable.
AI Content Platform · AI content generation ownership and accuracy
"Content generated by Jasper's AI is created using machine learning models and may require editing for accuracy, tone, and compliance with your brand guidelines. You are responsible for reviewing, editing, and approving all AI-generated content before publication. Jasper does not guarantee that AI-generated outputs will be free from errors or suitable for any particular purpose."
Why it works:
Jasper addresses the specific use case of AI-generated marketing content. Their disclaimer is tailored to content creators who will publish AI outputs, making the review requirement a workflow step rather than just a legal formality. The 'brand guidelines' reference shows they understand their audience is marketing professionals.
Creative AI Tool · AI design and content tool limitations
"Our AI-powered features, including Magic Write and Magic Design, use artificial intelligence to generate suggestions, text, images, and design elements. These outputs are generated by machine learning models and may not always be accurate, appropriate, or free from bias. You should review all AI-generated content before using it in your designs."
Why it works:
Canva addresses the unique challenge of AI in creative work, where outputs are visual and textual. Their disclaimer covers both text generation (Magic Write) and image generation (Magic Design) in one cohesive statement. The mention of potential bias is forward-thinking and addresses growing concerns about AI-generated visual content.
AI Writing Assistant · AI writing suggestions and privacy
"Grammarly uses artificial intelligence and natural language processing to provide writing suggestions, including grammar corrections, tone adjustments, and generative AI text. These suggestions are algorithmically generated and may not always reflect perfect grammar, style, or factual accuracy. Users should exercise their own judgment when accepting or rejecting suggestions."
Why it works:
Grammarly distinguishes between corrective AI (grammar fixes) and generative AI (new text creation), which is important because users have different expectations for each. Their 'exercise your own judgment' framing empowers users rather than just disclaiming liability, which aligns with their brand as a writing enhancement tool.
Creative AI · AI image generation and content credentials
"Adobe Firefly generates images using generative AI models trained on licensed content, Adobe Stock, and public domain content. Generative AI outputs may contain unexpected or inaccurate content. Adobe applies Content Credentials to AI-generated images to promote transparency about how content was created. You are responsible for ensuring AI-generated content is appropriate for your intended use."
Why it works:
Adobe's disclaimer is pioneering in the creative AI space by introducing Content Credentials — metadata tags that identify AI-generated images. This proactive transparency approach goes beyond legal compliance and sets an industry standard. Their training data provenance disclosure (licensed, not scraped) addresses a key creator concern.
AI Art Generation · AI art ownership and usage rights
"Images generated using Midjourney are created by artificial intelligence and may resemble existing artwork, photographs, or other visual content. You are responsible for ensuring that your use of generated images does not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. Generated images may contain artifacts, inaccuracies, or unintended content."
Why it works:
Midjourney addresses the most contentious issue in AI art: intellectual property and resemblance to existing works. Their disclaimer directly acknowledges that outputs may look like real artwork and places the responsibility for IP compliance on the user. This is legally critical given ongoing lawsuits around AI training data in the art community.
AI Code Generation · AI code suggestions and security disclaimer
"GitHub Copilot generates code suggestions using AI models. Suggestions are generated algorithmically and may include code that resembles publicly available code, contains bugs, security vulnerabilities, or does not follow best practices. You are responsible for reviewing, testing, and validating all code suggestions before use in your projects. GitHub Copilot is not a substitute for professional software development practices."
Why it works:
GitHub Copilot's disclaimer is critical for developers because AI-generated code can introduce security vulnerabilities. Their explicit mention of bugs, security issues, and resemblance to public code addresses the three biggest risks in AI-assisted development. The 'not a substitute for professional practices' language protects against over-reliance.
Enterprise CRM AI · Enterprise AI predictions and data handling
"Einstein AI features provide predictions, recommendations, and generated content based on your organization's data and AI models. AI-generated predictions and recommendations are probabilistic in nature and should not be the sole basis for business decisions. Administrators should configure appropriate guardrails and review processes for AI features within their organization."
Why it works:
Salesforce tailors their AI disclaimer to enterprise buyers by emphasizing administrator control and organizational governance. Their 'should not be the sole basis for business decisions' language is calibrated for the CRM context where AI predictions influence sales, marketing, and customer service decisions with real revenue impact.
Marketing AI · Marketing AI content and compliance
"HubSpot's AI tools, including Content Assistant and ChatSpot, use artificial intelligence to generate marketing content, email copy, blog posts, and other materials. AI-generated content is a starting point and should be reviewed and edited for accuracy, brand voice, and regulatory compliance before publishing. AI-generated content may not comply with industry-specific advertising regulations."
Why it works:
HubSpot uniquely addresses marketing compliance in their AI disclaimer — a critical concern since AI-generated marketing content may violate FTC endorsement guidelines, CAN-SPAM, or industry-specific advertising rules. Their 'starting point' framing positions AI as a draft tool, setting the right expectation for marketing teams.
Workspace AI · Workspace AI content and data usage
"Notion AI uses artificial intelligence to help you write, summarize, translate, and brainstorm within your workspace. AI-generated outputs may not always be accurate or complete and should be reviewed before use. Notion AI may use third-party AI services to process your requests. Your workspace content is not used to train AI models unless you explicitly opt in."
Why it works:
Notion addresses the key concern for productivity AI: data privacy of workspace content. Their explicit opt-in model for AI training data is a strong trust signal. The disclosure of third-party AI service providers (they use OpenAI) is transparent about the supply chain, which enterprise buyers increasingly require.
Communication AI · Meeting AI transcription and summarization
"Zoom AI Companion provides meeting summaries, transcriptions, and smart replies using artificial intelligence. AI-generated meeting summaries may not capture all discussion points and may contain inaccuracies. All meeting participants will be notified when AI Companion features are active. AI Companion does not use your audio, video, or chat content to train Zoom's or third-party AI models."
Why it works:
Zoom's disclaimer directly addresses their 2023 controversy about AI training data use. The explicit 'does not use content to train AI models' statement is a direct response to user concerns. Their participant notification requirement goes beyond legal minimums and builds trust for organizations adopting AI meeting tools.
News & Media · News organization AI usage transparency policy
"Reuters uses artificial intelligence tools to assist in news reporting, including automated data analysis, translation, and content summarization. All AI-assisted content is reviewed and verified by human journalists before publication. AI-generated text, images, or video will be clearly labeled. Reuters does not publish fully AI-generated news articles without human editorial oversight and verification."
Why it works:
Reuters and AP set the gold standard for AI disclosure in journalism. Their commitment to human oversight on all AI-assisted content addresses the existential concern about AI-generated misinformation in news. The clear labeling requirement for AI content and the prohibition on fully automated articles without human review protects editorial integrity.
$500–$2,000+
per document
5–15 hours
of research & writing
Free
to get started
Get our comprehensive guide covering EU AI Act, FTC, and state-level AI transparency requirements — so your AI disclaimer covers all the bases.
Based on the patterns we see in the best examples above, here are six essential steps to writing an AI disclaimer that is both legally compliant and builds user trust.
Audit every place AI is used in your product or business. This includes obvious features like chatbots and content generation, but also less visible uses like recommendation algorithms, search ranking, fraud detection, and automated moderation. Companies like Salesforce excel because they map AI usage across their entire platform and provide granular disclaimers for each feature.
Under the EU AI Act, AI systems are classified by risk: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. High-risk AI (hiring, credit scoring, healthcare) requires extensive documentation and transparency. Limited-risk AI (chatbots, content generation) requires basic disclosure. Determine your risk level to understand your legal obligations — this directly affects what your disclaimer must include.
Avoid vague language like 'we may use advanced technology.' Instead, follow Google's approach: explicitly name the AI features, what they do, and what technology powers them. Say 'This content was generated by an AI language model' rather than 'This content was created using automated tools.' Specificity builds trust and satisfies regulatory requirements.
Every AI disclaimer should acknowledge that AI outputs are probabilistic and may contain errors. Follow OpenAI's pattern: explain that AI-generated content 'may not accurately reflect real people, places, or facts.' For domain-specific applications, add relevant caveats — Anthropic's disclaimer excludes medical, legal, and financial advice specifically.
Users increasingly want to know: 'Is my data training your AI?' Follow Zoom's approach after their 2023 controversy — explicitly state whether user content is used for AI training and provide opt-out mechanisms. Notion's explicit opt-in model for AI training data has become a trust standard that users expect from responsible AI companies.
The EU AI Act requires human oversight for high-risk AI systems. Even for lower-risk applications, follow Reuters' approach: state that AI outputs are reviewed by humans before publication. Include instructions for requesting human review of AI-generated decisions, reporting AI errors, and opting out of AI features entirely. This gives users agency and satisfies the most stringent regulatory frameworks.
AI transparency regulation is evolving rapidly. Here are the major legal frameworks that affect AI disclaimer requirements and their key provisions.
An AI disclaimer is a legal notice that informs users when artificial intelligence is being used to generate, assist with, or influence content, decisions, or services. It typically explains the limitations of AI outputs, clarifies that AI-generated content may contain errors, and states who is responsible for verifying accuracy. AI disclaimers are increasingly required by regulations like the EU AI Act and FTC guidelines.
It depends on your jurisdiction and use case. The EU AI Act (effective 2025-2026) requires AI system transparency and disclosure for many applications. The FTC has stated that failing to disclose AI-generated content can constitute a deceptive practice. Several US states have passed AI transparency laws. Even where not strictly required, an AI disclaimer protects your business from liability and builds user trust.
A comprehensive AI disclaimer should include: a clear statement that AI is being used, what specific AI features or tools are involved, limitations and accuracy caveats, a statement that AI outputs should be reviewed by humans, who is responsible for AI-generated content, how user data interacts with AI systems, whether content is used for AI training, and how to opt out of AI features if applicable.
Yes, in most cases. If you use AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Jasper to generate content that you publish, many regulations and platform policies require disclosure. The FTC considers undisclosed AI-generated content potentially deceptive. Google's content policies require AI-generated content to provide value and be transparent. Academic institutions require AI use disclosure. The safest approach is always to disclose.
Place your AI disclaimer where users encounter AI-generated content. Best practices include: in your website footer or terms of service, adjacent to AI-generated content (inline disclaimers), in chatbot interfaces before conversations begin, in product descriptions if AI-generated, on AI-assisted search results, in email footers for AI-drafted messages, and in your general terms of service or acceptable use policy.
While often used interchangeably, an AI disclaimer typically limits liability ('AI outputs may contain errors') while an AI disclosure focuses on transparency ('this content was created with AI assistance'). Best practice is to include both: disclose that AI is being used AND disclaim responsibility for potential inaccuracies. The EU AI Act and FTC guidelines effectively require both elements.
Yes. Without proper AI disclaimers, you face several legal risks: FTC enforcement for deceptive practices if AI-generated content is presented as human-created, EU AI Act violations carrying fines up to 35 million EUR, state-level AI transparency law penalties, professional liability if AI-generated advice causes harm, and consumer protection lawsuits for misleading AI-powered recommendations.
Update your AI disclaimer whenever you: add new AI features or tools, change AI providers (e.g., switching from OpenAI to Anthropic), modify how AI interacts with user data, expand AI use to new areas of your business, or when new AI regulations take effect. Given the rapid pace of AI regulation, review your disclaimer at least quarterly. The EU AI Act implementation timeline through 2026 means frequent updates will be necessary.
Generate a customized AI disclaimer in minutes
Download a free, editable disclaimer template
General disclaimer examples across industries
15 real privacy policy examples analyzed
Understanding the EU's AI transparency regulation
Ensure your business complies with the EU AI Act
Join thousands of businesses using PolicyForge to create compliant AI disclaimers. No legal expertise required.
No credit card required. Takes less than 5 minutes.